Description
Objective:
-
The objective of this assignment is to understand Database Administration, and Database Security.
Plagiarism Policy:
-
This assignment is an individual task. Collaboration of any type amounts to a violation of the academic integrity policy and will be reported to the AIO.
-
Content cannot be copied verbatim from any source(s). Please understand the concept and write in your own words. In addition, cite the actual source. Failing to do so will be considered as plagiarism and/or cheating.
-
The Dalhousie Academic Integrity policy applies to all material submitted as part of this course. Please understand the policy, which is available at: https://www.dal.ca/dept/university_secretariat/academic-integrity.html
Assignment Rubric
|
Excellent (25%) |
Proficient (15%) |
Marginal (5%) |
Unacceptable |
|||
|
(0%) |
||||||
|
Completeness |
All required tasks |
Submission highlights |
Some tasks are |
Incorrect and |
||
|
including |
are completed |
tasks completion. |
completed, which |
irrelevant |
||
|
Citation |
However, missed some |
are disjoint in |
||||
|
tasks in between, which |
nature. |
|||||
|
created a disconnection |
||||||
|
Correctness |
All parts of the |
Most of the given tasks are |
Most of the given |
Incorrect and |
||
|
given tasks are |
correct However, some |
tasks are |
unacceptable |
|||
|
correct |
portions need minor |
incorrect. The |
||||
|
modifications |
submission |
|||||
|
requires major |
||||||
|
modifications. |
||||||
|
Novelty |
The submission |
The submission lacks |
The submission |
There is no |
||
|
contains novel |
novel contributions. There |
does not contain |
novelty |
|||
|
contribution in key |
are some evidences of |
novel |
||||
|
segments, which is |
novelty, however, it is not |
contributions. |
||||
|
a clear indication |
significant |
However, there is |
Summer 2021 saurabh.dey@dal.ca
|
of application |
an evidence of |
|||
|
knowledge |
some effort |
|||
|
Clarity |
The written or |
The written or graphical |
The written or |
Failed to prove |
|
graphical |
materials and developed |
graphical |
the clarity. Need |
|
|
materials, and |
applications do not show |
materials, and |
proper |
|
|
developed |
clear picture of the |
developed |
background |
|
|
applications |
concept. There is room for |
applications fail to |
knowledge to |
|
|
provide a clear |
improvement |
prove the clarity. |
perform the tasks |
|
|
picture of the |
Background |
|||
|
concept, and |
knowledge is |
|||
|
highlights the |
needed |
|||
|
clarity |
Citation:
McKinney, B. (2018). The impact of program-wide discussion board grading rubrics on students’ and faculty satisfaction. Online Learning, 22(2), 289-299.
Tasks
-
Read the given paper and write summary (Maximum 2 pages in your own words – Do not copy any content verbatim).
-
In addition, explore** and report, if the paper has any scope of improvements in terms of technical details or concepts.
-
Due to time constraint, and limitation of formal background research, you do not need to explore any presented scientific equations or parameters in details
Visit and Login to https://dal.ca.libguides.com/ieee and search the following papers.
3. Do not forget to provide citation in proper format for the given paper and for any other supporting materials that you may use as reference.
Database Administration and Security Reading
H. Yaish and M. Goyal, “Multi-tenant Database Access Control,” 2013 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2013, pp. 870-877, doi:
10.1109/CSE.2013.131.
Paper Link: https://ieeexplore-ieee-org.ezproxy.library.dal.ca/document/6755311
Assignment 5 Submission Format:
Submit one single PDF file
Summer 2021 saurabh.dey@dal.ca
