Description
Question 1 – 25 points
• [10 points] Find the asymptotic running times in big O notation of the following recurrence equations by using the repeated substitution method. Show your steps in detail.
▪ T(n) = 3T (n/3) + n, where T(1) = 1 and n is an exact power of 3.
▪ T(n) = 2T (n − 1) + n2, where T(1) = 1.
▪ T(n) = 3T (n/4) + n.logn, where T(1) = 1 and n is an exact power of 4.
▪ T(n) = 3T (n/2) + 1, where T(1) = 1 and n is an exact power of 2.
• [10 points] Trace the following sorting algorithms to sort the array [5, 6, 8, 4, 10, 2, 9, 1, 3, 7] in ascending order. Use the array implementation of the algorithms as described in the slides and show all major steps.
◦ Bubble Sort
◦ Selection Sort
• [5 points] Write the recurrence relation of quick sort algorithm for the worst case, and solve it. Show all the steps clearly.
2
Fundamental Structures of Computer Science II
Question 2 – 60 points
Implement the following methods in the sorting.cpp file:
(a) [40 points] Implement the insertion sort, merge sort, quick sort and radix sort algorithms. Your functions should take an array of integers and the size of that array or the first and last index of the array and then sort it in the ascending order. Add two counters to count and return the number of key comparisons and the number of data moves for all sorting algorithms. Your functions should have the following prototypes:
void insertionSort(int *arr, const int size, int &compCount, int &moveCount); void mergeSort(int *arr, const int size, int &compCount, int &moveCount); void quickSort(int *arr, const int size, int &compCount, int &moveCount); void radixSort(int *arr, const int size);
For key comparisons, you should count each comparison like k1 < k2 as one comparison, where k1 and k2 correspond to the value of an array entry (that is, they are either an array entry like arr[i] or a local variable that temporarily keeps the value of an array entry).
For data moves, you should count each assignment as one move, where either the right-hand side of this assignment or its left-hand side or both of its sides correspond to the value of an array entry (e.g. a swap function mostly has 3 data moves).
(b) [15 points] In this part, you will analyze the performance of the sorting algorithms that you implemented in part a. Write a function named performanceAnalysis which creates four identical arrays of 2000 random integers. Use one of the arrays for the insertion sort, second for merge sort, third for the quick sort, and the last one for the radix sort algorithm. Output the elapsed time (in milliseconds), the number of key comparisons and the number of data moves. Number of key comparisons and data moves are not required for the radix sort. Also, implement a function that prints the elements in an array.
void printArray(int arr, int size);
void performanceAnalysis();
Repeat the experiment for the following sizes: 6000, 10000, 14000, 18000, 22000, 26000, 30000. When the performanceAnalysis function is called, it needs to produce an output similar to the following one:
3
Fundamental Structures of Computer Science II
Listing 2: Sample output
—————————————————–
Part a – Time Analysis of Insertion Sort
Array Size
Time Elapsed
compCount
moveCount
2000
x ms
x
x
4000
x ms
x
x
…
—————————————————–
Part b – Time Analysis of Merge Sort
Array Size
Time Elapsed
compCount
moveCount
2000
x ms
x
x
4000
x ms
x
x
…
—————————————————–
Part c – Time Analysis of Quick Sort
Array Size
Time Elapsed
compCount
moveCount
2000
x ms
x
x
4000
x ms
x
x
…
—————————————————–
(c) [5 points, mandatory] Create a main.cpp file which does the following in order:
◦ Creates 4 identical arrays of the following numbers: {7,3,6,12,13,4,1,9,15,0,11,14,2,8,10,5}
◦ Calls the insertionSort method and the printArray() method
◦ Calls the mergeSort method and the printArray() method
◦ Calls the quickSort method and the printArray() method
◦ Calls the radixSort method and the printArray() method
◦ Calls the performanceAnalysis() method
4
Fundamental Structures of Computer Science II
At the end, write a basic Makefile which compiles all of your code and creates an executable file named hw1. Check out this tutorial for writing a simple makefile:
http://www.cs.colby.edu/maxwell/courses/tutorials/maketutor/
Please make sure that your Makefile works properly, otherwise you will not get any points from Question 2.
Important: Run your executable and add the screenshot of the console to the solution of Question 2 in the pdf submission. Also, while running radix sort for big array sizes you might run out of memory which will cause your program to fail. If that happens, you can decrease the array sizes for radix sort.
Question 3 – 15 points
After running your programs, you are expected to prepare a single page report about the experimental results that you obtained in Question 2c. With the help of a spreadsheet program (Microsoft Excel, Matlab, Python or other tools), plot elapsed time versus the size of array for each sorting algorithm implemented in Question 2. Combine the outputs of each sorting algorithm in a single graph.
In your report, you need to discuss the following points:
• Interpret and compare your empirical results with the theoretical ones. Explain any differences between the empirical and theoretical results, if any.
• How would the time complexity of your program change if you applied the sorting algorithms to an array of increasing numbers instead of randomly generated numbers?
5
